Contact
Please get in touch. We will be pleased to assist you.
+49 89 68004 - 0
(Mon. to Fri., 8:00 am to 5:00 pm)
Service & Repair
+49 89 68004 - 666
Mon. to Thurs., 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
Fri., 8:00 am to 4:00 pm
Questions about software: software-support@pcs.com
Questions about hardware /
other questions:
support@pcs.com
Our partner
PCS works with approximately 100 software and system house partners from all over the world. They offer security solutions based on INTUS products and addressing all areas of production data collection and security technology.Career
We are constantly looking for new, committed colleagues to strengthen our team.
Contact
Andrea Scholz
Personalreferentin Recruiting
Physical access control and logical access management.
Access control and logical access control are often used interchangeably in everyday business contexts. Both terms appear in the context of security and IT concepts — but they mean different things.
Physical access control regulates who is allowed to enter physical areas. Logical access control determines who can use digital systems and data.
This distinction is critical for correctly planning and coordinating security measures within a company.
Physical access control protects physical areas against unauthorized entry and defines which people are allowed to enter buildings, rooms, or premises.
Typical characteristics include:
Logical access control protects digital systems, applications, and data against unauthorized use. It determines who is allowed to log in to IT systems and which permissions apply there.
Typical characteristics include:
Despite these differences, both concepts are based on the same basic principle:
Only authorized persons are granted access to protected resources — regardless of whether they are physical or digital.
The difference lies in which resources are protected: buildings, rooms, and areas on the one hand, and systems, applications, and data on the other.
In practice, physical access control and logical access control are often not clearly distinguished. This can create security gaps.
Typical mistakes include:
With INTUS Flex, we offer versatile mechatronic locking systems.
DEXIOS is our modern software solution for time tracking and access control.
We offer the right access readers for every installation type and application.
RFID cards and transponders for time recording and access control – PCS offers a wide selection.
The INTUS ACMs control connected readers and door contacts.
| Criterion | Physical access control | Logical access control |
|---|---|---|
| Protected asset | Buildings, rooms, premises | Systems, applications, data |
| Purpose | Controls access to areas | Controls the use of resources |
| Examples | Doors, barriers, server rooms | Login, VPN, software access |
| Identification | ID badge, PIN, biometrics | Password, MFA, user account |
| Permissions | Rooms, zones, time profiles | Roles, permissions, access levels |
| Responsibility | Building security, facility management | IT, IT security |
| Risk if gaps exist | Unauthorized entry into sensitive areas | Unauthorized access to systems or data |
Physical access control and logical access control are directly interconnected in practice.
Insufficiently secured physical access can lead to systems, devices, or data being compromised. At the same time, strong IT security is of little value if logical access is not clearly regulated or permissions are defined too broadly.
That is why modern companies take a holistic approach:
Only through this interaction can a resilient security structure be created. The key is that physical and logical permissions are not considered in isolation, but planned, documented, and regularly reviewed together.
Physical access control protects physical areas, while logical access control secures digital systems and data. However, the decisive factor is not the distinction alone, but the consistent integration of both areas of security. Only when physical and logical permissions are coordinated can a comprehensive security concept be created.
In practice, this means that security measures should not be planned separately, but understood as part of a shared permissions and protection concept.
