Contact

Please get in touch. We will be pleased to assist you.

Go to contact form

Newsletter

+49 89 68004 - 0
(Mon. to Fri., 8:00 am to 5:00 pm)

kontakt@pcs.com

PCS Locations

Service & Repair

Device Repair Order Form

Transpondertest-Form

+49 89 68004 - 666
Mon. to Thurs., 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
Fri., 8:00 am to 4:00 pm

Questions about software: software-support@pcs.com

Questions about hardware /
other questions:
support@pcs.com

Our partner

PCS works with approximately 100 software and system house partners from all over the world. They offer security solutions based on INTUS products and addressing all areas of production data collection and security technology.

Solution partner

Installation partner

Career

We are constantly looking for new, committed colleagues to strengthen our team.

Career page

Contact
Andrea Scholz
Personalreferentin Recruiting

+49 89 68004 - 0

Zwei Personen bei Zeitbuchung am INTUS 5200

Mandatory time recording: what companies need to know

Mandatory time recording already applies to employers today. Even though some individual legal details are still being discussed, the decisive question is no longer whether working time must be recorded, but how companies can organize time recording in a transparent and practical way.

Case law has established key guidelines in recent years. This results in a clear framework for action: working hours must be recorded in a way that is traceable, reliable, and verifiable in the event of a dispute.

This article explains the legal basis for the obligation, which practical implications arise from it, and why digital time recording is becoming increasingly important in this context.

 

Legal basis at a glance

The development of time recording can be traced through four key decisions. They show how the requirements have become more specific step by step.

DecisionKey point
ECJ, May 14, 2019Objective, reliable, and accessible system for recording working time required
BAG, September 13, 2022Legal obligation to record working time already applies today
Emden Labor Court, February 20, 2020Lack of time recording can put employers in difficulty providing evidence in the event of a dispute
BAG, February 12, 2025 – 5 AZR 51/24An automatic break deduction does not replace proof that breaks were actually taken

While the ECJ and BAG have shaped the central guidelines, decisions such as the one by the Emden Labor Court primarily show the importance that traceable documentation can have in the event of a dispute.

 

Which requirements companies must now meet for time recording

The court decisions result in clear requirements for companies regarding the documentation, verifiability, and organization of working time. These include the following points in particular:

  • Document working hours completely — the start, end, and duration of daily working time must be recorded in a traceable way.
  • Keep maximum working hours and rest periods in view — compliance with legal requirements must be ensured organizationally and, in case of doubt, be traceable.
  • Record breaks individually — an automatic break deduction does not replace proof that breaks were actually taken.
  • Organize trust-based working time correctly — even with trust-based working time, the obligation to record the working time actually performed does not cease to apply.

What matters is not only the recording itself, but also a process that makes corrections, approvals, and evaluations traceable.

Why digital time recording is becoming increasingly important

Personen vor Gebäude und eine bedient RFID-Zutrittsleser mit RFID-Tag

Once the legal obligation is clear, the practical follow-up question arises: How can time recording be implemented so that it works reliably while remaining manageable in everyday operations?

Although the form of documentation has not yet been conclusively defined by law, paper lists or Excel files are prone to errors, time-consuming to maintain, and only limited in terms of analysis. Digital systems offer clear benefits here:

  • Working hours can be recorded reliably and traceably
  • Manual effort is reduced
  • Transparency for employees and managers increases
  • Reporting for planning and management becomes easier
  • Data can be transferred to payroll or ERP systems

With digital systems, data privacy, access rights, retention, and reporting options should be considered from the outset.

Especially where different working models, changing work locations, or more complex processes come together, the advantage of a solution becomes clear: it not only documents working time, but also makes it easy to evaluate properly.

 

Sie möchten die Zeiterfassung in Ihrem Unternehmen gesetzeskonform einführen?

Wir zeigen Ihnen, welche Lösung zu Ihrer Betriebsgröße und Branche passt.
Gemeinsam klären wir die nächsten Schritte.

Jetzt Kontakt aufnehmen.

 

Which building blocks can be derived from these requirements

The focus is on time recording solutions — such as terminals, software, and interfaces to payroll or ERP systems. When time recording is combined with access control, identification credentials, access readers, and access managers may also be relevant. Depending on the starting situation, different solutions can be used for this:

Time recording terminals
Zeiterfassungsterminal INTUS 5200 freigestellt

Modern technology and a customizable interface.

View products
DEXICON
Monitor zeigt DEXICON Software

Software for access control and time tracking with an SAP interface.
 

View software
Access managers
Zutrittskontrollmanager INTUS ACM80e Produktansicht

The INTUS ACMs control connected readers and door contacts.

View products
Access reader
Zutrittsleser INTUS 700touch in Frondansicht

We offer the right access readers for every installation type and application. 

View products
Identification media
Identmedien Karten und Tags verschiedene Ausführungen

RFID cards and transponders for time recording and access control – PCS offers a wide selection.

View products

 

Outlook: will weekly maximum working time replace the daily eight-hour day?

The discussion around making working time more flexible is continuing at the political level. Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz stated in July 2025 that he supports a stronger focus on weekly rather than daily maximum working time. There is also political debate about whether the Working Hours Act should be amended accordingly. However, concrete legislative implementation remains to be seen.

Regardless of future developments, reliable documentation of working time remains important to ensure occupational health and safety, verifiability, and organizational transparency. Especially with more flexible working time models, traceable time recording is likely to become even more important.

Companies that structure their time recording now create a better foundation for transparent processes, reliable evidence, and future adjustments. A digital solution can help document working hours traceably, simplify reporting, and make existing processes more efficient.

 

Our expert for employment law questions

Your PCS Contact

Susanne Plank
Press

Go to contact form
Susanne Plank, Presse
* required fields!